The Khariji method of attacking Ali as being a coward !

Let see the video and his (disgusting) word:



Muhammad Hussein Fadlallah say at 1:03 : On the subject that her rib was broken, and this subject is intellectually inconceivable (illogical) why ? Some people will say, "o Sayyed you don't believe in what happened to Fatima al-Zahraa ?" As if it was from the Fundamentals of the religion (Usul al-Din) I would like you that you think with me al-Zahraa is the wife of Ali (as) and she is the deposit of the Messenger of Allah to Ali and she is loved by all the nation (Ummah) [...] It is true than when Ali refused to give allegiance they came and threatened to burn the house and they said, "How do you want to burn the house and Fatima is in?" And this show that the Muslims [He did not finish his sentence] is this reasonable (logic) for you that Fatima daughter of the Messenger of Allah will be burned? They said "So what?" And he said after - (I don't care) if it is true or not true (authentic) that he (Ali) was threatened and did not react - Anyway the important is if they attack Fatima what is the role of Imam Ali? Imam Ali is a coward? All of you are married let say that someone want to attack, beat, or kill [etc] your wife will you stay sitting and say "There is no power, and no strength, except through God the Most High, the Greatest." or will you defend her? If you don't defend your wife what the people will say? This is first, secondly Ali is not the only one in the house, there was people from Bani Hash and it even say that [there was] Zubayr the son of the uncle of Imam Ali. He took up his sword to outside because they were not inside (of the house) and his sword broke - So you let al-Zahraa have her ribs broken, and the other one have his sword broken and another put a nail in her chest.as they say a rusty nail as they say (Fadlallah said it with a smile) is this reasonable ? Think about it.

Sayyed Murtadha al-Shirazi answer him at 4:05 : The one that deny the story of attacking the house of the Siddiqata al-Zahraa (as) and her being beat with what clear and authentic proof (does he do it) ? With the reason and the connection ? He say that Ali Ibn Abi Talib (as) had a great and valuable courage [etc] so how can he agrees (accept) with what happen to his wife being beaten in front of him ? He deny all the historical story with an "emotional" proof. So what do you say of the Prophet (saw) ? The Prophet did not see while he was in Meccah that the muslims are being despised and tortured? And that Somaya the woman is being tortured? The Prophet used to come [...] so the prophet is (God forbid) a coward and have no courage? He could have take his sword and kill them, he was more courageous than hundreds of people. [...] The Prophet did not see that the muslims, women and men being tortured in Meccah? Why did the Prophet did not interfere, why did he command (the people) to have patience, do you not see that there is alot of people to attack and you choosed to attack Ali Ibn Abi Talib (as) ? The commander is commanded to have patience, he got a recommendation from his brother that this world is only to test you. [...] Is this true that everything is to Allah ? Yes sure, why does Allah see muslims in jail and until know in some country of the west. In the time of Musa and Hajjaj the women were not tortured? They would open their bellies (with knives), they would attack their honour, why did Allah not interfere? [...] And you find only Ali Ibn Abi Talib (as) to attack ? If a person think he will know that this world (Duniah) is only a test, an exam. [...] Propets would see things like that and not react because it is from the exterior aspect of the world it is only a test and Ali was like that if he wanted to kill them, he would have killed all of them. But the word stay, "This world is the world of test, of trial." [...] Because it was the command of the Messenger of Allah, this is the advise that he got.

First, we see that Fadlallah compare our Pure and Infallible Imam to simple human that do mistake and don't control theirselves like us and this is truly the Qiyas (analogy) of Sunnism.

Second, he use the same claim was the Wahabi to deny this by saying that "Ali was a coward because he did not react."

Third, he mock what happened and even smiles and laugh about it.

Fourth, he don't see this as important to our religion, and attack those who talk and think about it.

Fifth, he say that the Messenger of Allah and Ali are coward because they did not take out their sword (as the claim of the Khawarij and the Zaydis) and they had to do it.

Finally we can conclude that Fadlallah was not academic and his way was not the one of a scholar (unlike Sayyed Murtadha al-Shirazi) because he preferred emotions before the evidence as women and we can clearly see that what happened was a trial from Allah and that they don't act as us.